1/2vmv Is nonsense ...Argument #1

The first argument explains that the thousands of years old testing device of the lever/balance decisively proves that there is no room in real physics for 1/2vmv. The balance allows you to test different masses and velocities and plainly see the equalities. The balance says a 1 Mass going 2 Velocity is the same "energy" as a 2 mass going 1 velocity. The proof of the equality is complete and disputes the argument that the 1 Mass going 2 Velocity has twice the "energy".

1/2vmv Is nonsense ...Argument #1b

In this addition to the first argument I describe a spinning top which demonstrates not only equalities in gravitational force but also what masses and velocities are equal as angular momentum. I also include an explanation of how gravity actually works to produce momentum.

1/2vmv Is nonsense ...Argument #2

This video deals with thrust and work using the examples of moving a spaceship (or object in space) and the ballistic pendulum. What is demonstrated is that kinetic energy (if it was real) can't be collected as a form of energy that can be converted to work or more precisely momentum. Experiments show that momentum is conserved and kinetic energy cannot be conserved without creating free or extra momentum.

1/2vmv Is nonsense ...Argument #3

This video generally deals with collisions where kinetic energy is not conserved and it is demonstrated that if it was real it can't do any real work. Also referenced his lack of consistency with mechanisms like electricity where the parallel function of voltage is not squared. There is also a light reference to the fact that moving fluids do not behave consistent with kinetic energy Theory.

1/2vmv Is nonsense ...Argument #4

This video explains how gravitational force is collected and clearly illustrates it is a Time dependent force. Viewed as a Distance dependent Force creates paradoxical inconsistencies with what is known about weight. Also Illustrated are Galilean principles that explain why faster objects can travel proportionally more distance. It is demonstrated that the cause of this effect is the fact that friction is seldom linearly consistent.

1/2vmv Is nonsense ...Argument #5

This video deals with substances like water and wind and points out that any contrived increase in kinetic energy cannot be converted into useful work. Momentum is what is conserved because momentum is all there is.

1/2vmv Is nonsense ...Argument #6

This video asks the question do you really believe it takes 25 times this fuel to spin something five times as fast? The video goes on to explain how wrong assumptions regarding how gravity functions instigated a lot of bad science.

The leibnizian Axiom that 4 lbs dropped one foot is the same energy as 1 lb dropped 4 ft is False.

The false theory is Restated in the formula F=mgh (The correct formula is F=mgt ...gravity is a time-dependent force)

The false Axiom has never been tested by credible experiment.

No experimental references/sources

The Axiom can be restated as a 1 mass going 2 units of velocity is the same energy as a 4 mass going 1 unit of velocity.

A lever/balance clearly demonstrates that a 1 mass traveling 4 units of velocity is the same force/energy as a 4 mass traveling 1 velocity.

A rotating wheel In either a vertical or horizontal configuration provides confirming evidence.

Misunderstanding the true physics of energy is catastrophically destructive to the development of accurate and coherent physical Theory.

Errors in the foundation compound into more errors

net Force = the total (net) change in momentum

Gravity imposes momentum at a "rate" of 9.8 meters of velocity per "1" second interval.

What would our atomic weight be if electrons have the same mass as protons?

Can't link to any good evidence

No evidence it takes 25 times the fuel to rotate something five times faster.

Pressurized fluids a water hose their theory predicts I can change the energy of the pressure by changing the size of the exit valve.

Water has more energy if you narrow what it flows through

The ballistic pendulum demonstrates kinetic energy to be Phantom energy. Kinetic energy can't be converted into momentum

You have to use momentum to make heat. Heat is momentum

The liever or balance proves a 1 Mass going 4 velocity equals a 4 Mass going 1 velocity.

Newton wouldn't have proposed the third law if he believed in mv squared

The free momentum experiments

Can the same spring produce different momentums?

Low friction carts that don't store their energy as linear velocity.

Heavy small wheels fast rotating axle

Energy can never cancel... It must produce motion and matter are speed of light radiation.

An amount of movement cannot make more movement. There is no free momentum. The Paradox of twice the momentum forward and a unit of momentum backward.

Spinning top

Proves the weights don't balance ... The gravitational force collected is not equal

Also proves that the linear or angular momentum produced by the force that spun the top is not balanced or apportioned equally. The top will wobble and process

Law the lever is good solid science

1/2 MV squared is not good science it isn't even good religion because it makes claims it can be falsified or proven wrong fails testing

Their counter argument

The lever can't detect the hidden kinetic energy?

I will present in this paper a logical argument proving that momentum is the only real energy in the universe that momentum is the only quantity conserved through interactions exchanges and that the known facts cannot be collectively organized to support the claim that there is any such thing as a living Force formalized in the equation 1/2 MV squared

The bad Science History

A unproven by experiment axiom

Contradicts the well-proven law of the lever

The next bad science chapter

Madame Denting clay Rolling objects Sand explosions

The next bad chapter

Contrived a set of circular formulas to support the theory

The jewel experiments Dropping things in gravity

Force changes with time exposed to the force

The experiments

Water hose water wheel One half the volume at twice the speed cannot do more work Navigating in space landing on the moon 25 times the force 5 times the velocity

Represent catastrophic failures that would render the theory in viable if not majority held

Heat is momentum weight is momentum thrust is momentum

The two concepts of motion are not compatible has both cannot be conserved when energy is transferred between unlike masses

In every case tested momentum is concerned

The bad show experiments Hair tracks head energy Low friction carts her designed with wheel structures that store a lot of angular momentum

Guns and Newton's third law The law can't be applied

Impotent energy