AD HOC SHARED SERVICES


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Reto-Shared on Saturday, September 04, 2004 - 03:04 am:

For some unknown reason the AD HOC SHARED SERVICES COMMITTEE has decided to substantially reduce the amount of information they originally made available on line. I saved a copy of the original webpage. Although I don't think this committee will ever accomplish anything as regards to "shared services"-- it appears to have a knack for "ad hoc paradoxing". It intends to investigate sharing services by exclusively studying only this towns needs.... than it shares information by suppressing the content of its own website.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Anonymous on Saturday, September 04, 2004 - 08:57 am:

It's a joke.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By A Link on Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 12:51 am:

http://www.mendhamtownship.org

During 2004 Vincent Pagano shall be compensated at the salary rate provided in the
2001/2004 Agreement between the Township of Mendham and the Mendham Township Police Bargaining Unit , namely, at the rate of $59,152.00. Pursuant to Article XIII of the Agreement Patrolman Pagano’s holiday pay is included in the base salary.
3. The employment of Vincent Pagano as a Probationary Officer is pursuant

comment:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Jerks on Thursday, October 28, 2004 - 02:26 pm:

10/26/04 - Posted from the Daily Record newsroom
Police merger in Mendhams a 'dead issue'
By Rob Jennings, Daily Record

MENDHAM -- Opposition from the Mendham Police Department helped convince the borough -- for the second time this year-- to abandon consideration of a potential police merger with neighboring Mendham Township.

"The police department was very upset about it. You need to keep that police department working as a group," Mendham Mayor Richard Kraft said Monday, announcing that the borough will no longer explore the possibility of a merger.

The township, which had hoped to further examine the issue, will proceed under the assumption that a police partnership "is a dead issue," township Mayor Robert Pierson said Monday.

"We're disappointed. We thought there were opportunities there," Pierson said.

In February, the borough formed an "ad hoc shared services committee" to examine the issue after council members decided not to proceed with a joint study into a police merger that they previously commissioned with Mendham Township.

The 15-member ad hoc committee, which included Kraft, examined three possible police arrangements -- a merger, a shared services arrangement or renting part of the Mendham police building to the township's department.

The committee's chairwoman, Alexa Lewandowski, said the choices came down to "cohabitation, contract for services or consolidation" and ultimately were discarded for a variety of factors beyond objections from Mendham police.

The borough didn't want to function as a landlord, Lewandowski said. She said neither mayor wanted to fold his police department and sign a contract for police services with the other municipality.

"It wasn't a specific reason. It was a combination of reasons," said Lewandowski, who chairs the Mendham planning board.

Kraft said that, while any of the three scenarios likely would have saved money in both municipalities -- the ad hoc committee never prepared an estimate -- the Mendham Police Department's objections outweighed the possible benefits.

Some borough police officers spoke out publicly against a merger in January, shortly before the council, in a 4-3 vote, decided not to proceed with the second stage of a three-part study that was being prepared by former Randolph town manager J. Peter Braun.

The council's vote quickly sparked controversy because the wife of Councilman John Andrus, who voted against continuing the study, worked as a secretary in the Mendham Police Department.

Though the council's lawyer subsequently declared that Andrus should not have voted, the decision to quash the joint study was not overturned. The council took a second vote and unanimously endorsed creating the ad hoc committee to examine a variety of potential partnerships, including the merger.

Borough police chief Pat Cameron did not return a phone call.

Pierson said the township police department was supportive of the merger, but avoided getting drawn into the public debate.

"Our police force thought it was a good opportunity. They stayed out of it. Their feelings were hurt, certainly, about some of the things said about Mendham Township police," Pierson said.

Kraft said last winter that some borough residents had criticized the township police for being too quick to hand out tickets, instead of warnings, for traffic violations.

Others in the borough pointed out that the township, whose police building is outdated and will likely require a replacement, had much more than the borough to gain from a merger.

"We never discerned any clear public support for it," Kraft said.

Pierson said that, under a merger, no officers would have been laid off. Savings would have resulted in both municipalities when some officers retired and were not replaced, he added.

There are 13 officers in the township, including Chief Thomas Costanza, with two more expected to be hired by year's end, Pierson said.

The borough has 10 officers, Kraft said.

"We never got clearly to bottom-line, dollars-and-cents savings," Kraft said. "Would they be of a magnitude to make it worth the trouble?"

Pierson said there now would be no way to answer the question.

"We don't know because the study was never done," Pierson said.

Pierson added that the township "was not going away mad" and will continue working with the borough on an upcoming library merger and explore other opportunities to combine services.

Kraft said the ad hoc committee will continue exploring various partnerships with the township.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Snoopy on Sunday, November 07, 2004 - 01:31 pm:

At long last!!

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By A Link on Sunday, November 07, 2004 - 03:49 pm:

http://inmendham.com

Councilman [lame duck] Dolan raised issues with the Mayor regarding the ad hoc Shared Services Committee. The first comment was to inquire if the next meeting would be again closed to the public? the mayor replied that "yes it would be". Later Mr. Dolan asked the mayor some rather pointed questions regarding when he met with the mayor of the Township, and inquired who else was present at that meeting. The mayor replied that the meeting was around October 7th and that he and the chair person of the committee were the only committee persons present.

As context... apparently at this October meeting the mayor conveyed to the mayor of the Township that there will not be any degree of merger between the Borough and Township Police Department's. It is my personal speculation that Mr. Dolan thinks it inappropriate that the ad hoc committee should make this final determination, and to essentially act on it, without town council approval. Probably consistent with Mr. Dolan's understanding, it is my understanding that the ad hoc committee was obligated to "report" to the council and that it was given no authority to act unilaterally or without explicit consent of the council.

comment:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By A Link on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 - 06:17 am:

http://www.mendhamtownship.org

Mayor Pierson reported that he, along with Mr. Phelan and Mr. Mountain, met with Mendham Borough representatives and all agreed there is no further interest on the part of the Borough in the consolidation of the two police departments. Mr. Phelan said that no data was ever collected to confirm whether assessments of the situation used by the Borough were accurate. He said it is very disappointing but suggested concluding on a positive note by looking at the efforts on behalf of a joint library, municipal court, recreation and sharing of equipment.

Mr. Schrier shared comments made by a retiring member of the Chester Borough Council that said there should be one Chester not two Chesters. He also said it seemed unfortunate that one of the reasons for Mendham Borough to not want to go forward was because of the sentiment of the members of their police department. Mayor Pierson it was shameful that it came to that.

comment:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Very Krafty on Sunday, December 05, 2004 - 10:57 am:

http://www.inmendham.com

(At approximately 9:15PM there was a temporary recording problem and some audio may
have been lost.)

Mr. Henry referenced item #8 of the Administrator's Report, and noted that Mrs.
Lewandowski recounted her and Mayor Kraft's meeting with Mendham Township.

Motion by Mr. Henry to support the action taken by the Mayors of Mendham Borough and
Mendham Township, including the content of the press release issued jointly by the Mayors,
relative to discussions and studies on cohabitation, contracting for police services, and the
consolidation of police services.
Second by Mr. Garubo
Roll Call - the vote was unanimous as follows:
In favor: Henry, Garubo, Andrus, Haverkost, Witczak
For the record Atty. Jansen reminded Mr. Andrus of his conflict and asked him to change his
vote to " abstain ". Mr. Andrus declined to do so.
Opposed: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Dolan

comment:

Robin: Holly preposterous coincidence Batman It looks like the fix is in.

{Batman:} No Robin, it's just the fruits of our beautiful democracy demonstrating why the heathens would rather be murdered than have our superlative corruption shoved down their throats.

It's just a coincidence, that the town council voted in favor of a resolution supporting the covert actions of the mayor to suspend any possible consideration of a Police merger-- on the night that Councilman Dolan, a vigorous supporter of researching the possibility, was absent.

It's just a coincidence, that the phantom press release, wasn't released to me consistent with my long standing request for copies of information provided to newspapers and such.

It's just a coincidence, that the $7,000 recording system "failed" just seconds before this resolution was discussed and passed.

Next time you hear that the town council is creating a "ad hoc" committee you should know that's just doublespeak for-- "let's bury this issue, in an "advisory committee", that doesn't have to file a public report, but doesn't have to have a public meeting, and that can make policy for the Borough without ever having to account to the council or the public".

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Karftatorship on Friday, December 10, 2004 - 05:20 pm:

Here's the text of the "press release" demonstrating the Mayor's contempt for legal process, and contempt for the people's right to at least comment on "proposed" government action.

Date: 10-23-04

RE: Shared Services for Police Between Mendham Borough and Mendham Township.

After more than two years of inter-municipal discussions and almost a year of work by a Mendham Borough ad hoc committee, the Borough is unable to discern adequate benefit to the Borough, adequate public support for, nor a consensus among the Borough Council members relative to consolidation of the police departments of the Mendham Borough and Mendham Township.

The Mayors of Mendham Borough and Mendham Township met recently and although Township officials favor continuing talks, it was agreed to discontinue further discussion of merger of police services and to proceed with future planning for individual departments.

The two Mendhams will continue to share a municipal court and will still work cooperatively on recreation programs, road department functions and other activities. The towns are also working toward creation of a single, new "Library of the Mendhams" to be located in the Borough.

The officials of Mendham Borough and Mendham Township remain committed to seeking opportunities to work together to improve services for the citizens of each municipality.



The ad hoc committee regarding "merge services" was created with the explicit charter that it would "report" to the town council. It is in fact an advisory committee, and enjoys the legal benefit of not being required to publicly disclose any of its "work product" ...but the advantage of secrecy comes with a legal responsibility not to take "action" without consent of the council an in tern review by the public. In my estimation, the mayor has overtly broken the law [again] , and "someone" should make him account for that. I'm willing to do the legal research, and file legal papers, but I'm not willing to also finance another legal process. I estimate it will cost some $300.00 in court costs to force the mayor to account for his behavior. Unless someone "like you" is willing to pick up the tab-- I guess this will be just another government crime that goes unpunished.

If you can make a contribution send a e-mail "pledge" to: badmayor@inmendham.com


Add a Message


This is a public posting area. Your e-mail address is optional.
Username:  
Password: Not Needed
E-mail:
Post as "Anonymous"
This board closed post new subject HEAR