1) Regarding RESOLUTION #130-06: How did the individual members of the Council intend the words "political message" to be defined, and did YOU, in passing the resolution, intend suppression of First Amendment protected Speech to be "appropriate to the TV 25 mission"?
2) A substantial part of this year's budget increase was caused by a council initiative to start effectively pre-taxing taxpayers to pre-finance future expenditures. Considering the fact that having extra money around tends to make money easier to spend...and Considering that returns on private equity are generally higher than returns realized by government entities on capital accounts, and considering delays in budget drafting and approval have probably been the only cause for substantial "emergency" withdrawals from "reserve accounts"--Without using the "everyone else is doing it" excuse, how does the council defend maintaining reserves in excess of what is demanded by necessity?
By 07. 176... on Monday, June 04, 2007 - 8:22 pm:
I think they probably need the extra money because what they are soaking you for on the information requests isn't enough to keep ButterballRalph in doughnuts.
By 07. 07. 3....... on Monday, June 11, 2007 - 2:10 pm:
By 07. 113... on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 - 9:04 am:
can you please type this up like you used to do?
thanks!
By 07. 3....... on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 - 12:36 pm:
I'm pretty much passed giving a damn about this website ... at least I'm not gonna work at it until there's some evidence it's worth my efforts... you buttholes couldn't even support one of the propositions I wasted my time writing.
so until you support this website I'm not going to support it either.
By 07. 113... on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 9:39 am:
I only asked you to provide a text version because i can't stand looking at your ugly mug on my monitor.
so, whatever.
By 07. 3....... on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 12:31 pm:
In that case, I'll try to make the videos even longer...So fuck off to mendhamnj.org
By 07. 176... on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 9:23 pm:
Actually, I like the video version, but rather than Gary, how about some of your famous "canned" characters?
By 07. 3....... on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 10:11 pm:
quote:
How about some of your famous "canned" characters?
Can Do.
By 07. 176... on Monday, June 18, 2007 - 7:24 pm:
On second thought, how about a bunch of fleet enemas to represent the administration, since they are trying to stick it up our ass and clean us out?
By 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 3....... on Saturday, June 23, 2007 - 9:34 am: