As you scroll down the page just mouse over some empty space where the menu was, and it will pop back into view.
|
|
The Mendham [deer] Massacre
Mendham:
Town Stuff:
The Mendham [deer] Massacre
By Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 - 1:31 pm: |
Kill them, ALL, deer have no purpose but to be killed. |
By V on Monday, October 17, 2005 - 1:33 pm: |
PU Phooey ... Merrily as we go .. "Life, Liberty and the Persuit of Wealth" ... later amended to "Happiness". Weather you like it, or not. There is no tomorrow, you silly cow. |
By Colt45&SomeBuckshot on Monday, October 17, 2005 - 9:27 pm: |
The good thing about deer hunting season is, it keeps a lot of intoxicated drivers off the road. |
By Jamma-Lamma on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - 8:25 am: |
Gerry...I warned you about that Diareaha Mouth of yours...now be a good little lib and take some Pepto. |
By great idea on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - 9:50 pm: |
Hunt Deer ... have a little free town BBQ down at India Brook .. Free Deer Kabobs ... a Fair. Kinda like Whacking Day on the Simpsons ... |
By ItWasHereYesterday on Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 8:21 am: |
Wonder if that sack of shit from DPW is going to "acquire" anymore tree stands and ladders to haul out to Pa. Hunters be warned. |
By DeerSkinDeep on Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 10:29 pm: |
Two news stories (Recorder Newspapers ... Star-Ledger) but not one word about this side of the story. We go to the trouble and expense to airlift "dumb animal" pets out of Louisiana yet we let this unnecessary brutality take place on our public land. Human thy name is hypocrite! It seems pretty obvious that our humanity is a pretense and that under the veneer there's just the mind of a maggot. |
By jo-swiggilly on Friday, October 21, 2005 - 7:19 am: |
Dickhead....last time i checked the cats and dogs of the world were not causing millions of dollars of property damage and untold damage to cars (and in many instances killing people in car/deer crashes). Kill the deer, kill them all. |
By YES killThemAllToSaveThem on Friday, October 21, 2005 - 12:50 pm: |
Another maggot who can't (be bothered to) read-- I will say AGAIN the issue isn't whether or not to KILL DEER-- the issue is, should we do it humanely and efficiently or should we do it in the most brutal manner possible as directed by people who have a vested interest in the real problem being perpetuated. Obviously this psychotic lobby, attempting to defend their right to torture don't really care if they deceive "the people" as long as they get what they want.... but why would anyone think people capable of enjoying causing an animal hours of suffering would be bothered by cheap political tactics. Again - HUNTERS ARE NOT THE SOLUTION they are in fact PERPETUATING THE PROBLEM. |
By jo-swiggilly on Friday, October 21, 2005 - 2:54 pm: |
Brutal...humane...whatever. Either way works for me chump. |
By HuntingThe WrongAnswer on Friday, October 21, 2005 - 3:31 pm: |
Look chimp, there's really no point in expressing some simplistic, very arrogant opinion, if you are going to ignore every devilish detail. You are probably one of those morons who say things like nuke'em or kill all the dumb towel heads. If you really want the deer gone--hunters are not going to make that happen-- it's an important "detail" that they want to preserve the viability of their "sport" -- and having lots of deer available is how they do that. I'm advocating killing as many deer as possible, as inexpensively as possible, if that's agreeable with you then say so applying consistent logic and acknowledge that hunters are not, and will not, get the job done. As for you being incapable of making any meaningful distinctions between unnecessarily brutal and respectfully humane I hope when your time comes you know the pleasure of the indifferently imposed unnecessary suffering you deserve. |
By yep on Friday, October 21, 2005 - 5:56 pm: |
And I hope you go to Deer Heaven .. or Hell - as warranted. |
By fo-jibbillly on Friday, October 21, 2005 - 8:52 pm: |
they are deer asswipe....kill them all by any means necessary...poison, arrows (good enough for the injun) guns, a-bomb, smelling gerry's feet, ..whatever. |
By Sickobert Einstoneage on Friday, October 21, 2005 - 10:26 pm: |
quote:And I hope you go to Deer Heaven .. or Hell - as warranted.
I would be satisfied to get what I deserve-- nothing more, nothing less. I'm certain I have never been--willfully--callously indifferent to the suffering of any other living creature.... who didn't goddamn earn indifference. quote:they are deer asswipe....kill them all by any means necessary...poison, arrows (good enough for the injun) guns, a-bomb, smelling gerry's feet, ..whatever.
"Unnecessary and/or recreational Suffering" a truly brilliant human invention... there is an awful lot of human life that isn't functioning on a conscious level beyond a average deer's mentality ...by your logic we should be indifferent to their welfare. By my logic the human rase deserves extinction if it can't do better than that. |
By sha-poopy on Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 2:07 pm: |
Human 'rase'?? good one moron. [and yes, I'm also one of those maggots who doesn't discriminate much when it comes to 'towel heads' either.] |
By T.R. on Monday, October 24, 2005 - 6:29 am: |
OVERGROWN RATS!!!! DIE VERMON...I am sooooo glad the county has declared open season on the scurge of the area.Lets see if Jack Schrier and his wife are out there protesting...he used to and don't let him tell you he didn't...I almost ran him over by mistake on dark night years ago whilst going into Mo'town...there he was was with his wife and a bunch of other "protesters" in front of Lewis Morris...Man, its funny now that he is a slimy political hack...he is either silent on it or has done a complete about face...where are you now Jacky Boy??? yeah thats right...protecting your phoney baloney job...Freeloader...opps I mean Freeholder Director,my foot..... |
By 2....... . . . on Sunday, November 27, 2005 - 2:15 am: |
At the November 21st meeting the town council decided to alter the hunting/culling policy to allow bowhunting while the parks are open. The fact that they made this move going straight over the advice of legal counsel guarantees that if an accident does happen involving a pedestrian park user insurance won't be coming to the rescue and Borough taxpayers may pay a few million dollars to kill a few dozen deer in a brutally cruel manner in a Elmer Fudd-esk effort to make a irrelevant contribution to solving the serious problem of deer overpopulation-- let's also not forget that we may end up being responsible for destroying someone's life just so a sadistic 8% of the population could have some extra entertainment opportunities imposing suffering on "our" public land. Certainly the risk of us actually directly paying for this stupid cruelty is low... as there is no justice in the universe... just the practical fact that buying comfort, satisfaction or "fun" at the expense of something else's suffering is ethically bankrupting and is likely to leave the dealmaker and the buyer ultimately worthless if not a blight upon the universe. The town council claims our only two choices to control deer populations are, recreational civilian bow hunters or professional --$350.00 a pop--bounty bow hunters. Obviously I think there are a lot more choices... but it is a sad curiosity that so little effort has been expended in developing methods for the humane extermination of unwanted animal populations. Just as religious dogma has Jack Kevorkian in jail for exercising a little humanity by offering the dying a more efficient process-- hunting dogma is clearly inhibiting us (humanity) from applying a little science and invention to the problem of controlling "wildish" animal populations. It seems also apparent that the fact that efficient (humane) death is not a big moneymaker is also discouraging any movement in that direction. As illustration, a stray cat that has been a friend of mine for the last decade started doing the fading away thing this summer, and by the late fall it was time to offer some humane help. When the critical time arrived I was surprised to learn that the system in place to provide humane "putting to sleep" services was more "asleep" than I was hoping the cat would soon be. After making a half-dozen phone calls to local service providers the best I could do on that particular --in surgery or on vacation-- day, was to arrange for next day service at a cost that ranged between $35 and $110. Luckily and thankfully the cat rather peacefully found its own eternal rest during the night and I was spared over paying for far too little, far too late. The experience got me thinking about how underdone progress is regarding the simple necessities of life. Even the method used by veterinarians--in office lethal injection-- seems a lot more imperfect than it should be. Logically, it seems a specifically trained practitioner could make a very good living charging less for providing the "more" service of pet "ultimately deep sleep inducement" house calls.... but unfortunately we're not letting logic shape our world. Every now and then you hear about some "science fair" type contest offering a big money prize for the best solution/contraption fulfilling some fall-down but always get up, even on Mars criteria. The state of New Jersey has a very dangerous and very expensive deer problem-- for a decade its solution has been to let people who enjoy the problem and have a interest in perpetuating the problem, manage the problem. Obviously it hasn't worked and it is logically apparent this won't ever be a solution. It seems to me the more responsible approach would be to encourage smart people to develop the real solution, the dumb lazy voters are too stupid to demand. Unfortunately, nowadays, encouragement requires money as few people, sadly, especially smart ones, are driven by anything else... and if government remains as dumb as the voters that elect it, and the rich continue to be too soul-less and greedy to provide what a real solution requires, I guess nothing will change until something changes. For my part, I have been giving the "build a better deer/bigRat trap/execution-chamber" some thought... Practicality requires solution to be cheaper and "decency" requires painless efficiency making for a pretty demanding definition of "better". As I thought through the problem cheap sort of implied the need for a reusable and perhaps automated system.... combining that with the need to kill quickly (as deer are easily panicked) the kind of cosmetically ugly, even horrifying, but cleanly efficient guillotine came to mind. I won't go into a great deal of biology... but it needs to be understood that there are few, if any methods of death more painlessly efficient than one that instantly and completely blocks blood supply to the brain... it is pretty much as simple as no blood pressure, no consciousness. The other advantage of this method of death for this purpose is that the carcass isn't in any way polluted. So now the problem is narrowed to just finding a cheap, safe, way to lop off their heads. Obviously we have the technology to do better than a gravity pushed blade and building some very compact, perhaps spring loaded, yet equally efficient guillotining box wouldn't present much of a technical challenge. So now we are down to the problem of getting the deer to put their head in the box... which really shouldn't be too much of a problem considering their appetites. Obviously you couldn't just place a bunch of guillotine boxes throughout town... as something other than deer heads might get accidentally lopped off.... but properly engineered (redundant fail-safe systems) and used sensibly (ideally in areas where deer have been contained for such purpose) some such device could provide for a relatively inexpensive (especially over the long term) and very humane method of deer population control. I realize this all sounds kind of ghoulish, but just consider for a moment how unpleasant you can imagine it to be to have an arrow shot through your abdomen and having to wait through the few minutes or hours for it to finally finish you off. Nature is at times cruel, stupid, even grotesque ....but we certainly don't have to follow that example. Some kind of funny links: we invaded their country Little sociopathic cereal killers MICHIGAN BOW AND ARROW RELATED INCIDENTS |
By 2....... . . on Sunday, November 27, 2005 - 11:27 am: |
quote:quoting v#27 How bout after using gerrys deer head lopper, we put the heads on spikes all around the borders of mendham boro, perhaps the terrifying sight will keep other deer at bay.
Or we could post pictures of every arrow shot deer with a notice pointing out how long it took for the deer to die... unfortunately most dear probably can't read so they might not get the intended message.... but then again they might not get the head on a stick thing either. Animals kind of live in the bliss of ignorance when it comes to understanding the whole mortality thing... one can suppose if a member of the herd just suddenly lost his head they might just think it some sort of interesting trick intended to impress the ladies, and not realize it had any permanent significance. |
By 2....... . on Monday, November 28, 2005 - 12:42 am: |
quote:quoting v#27: IF we do that .. there should be similar signs on the side of the road where auto / deer collisions have taken place, neon signs for any people killed, and any medical and automobile repair bills to be sent to the only champion of the deer .. gerry the witless admin. ...How about Deer Poison ?
I have explicitly stated that I would --if given the power--eradicate every deer in the state, and this loony tune-- defending imposing completely gratuitous and unnecessary suffering-- has the laughable imbecility to call me a "champion of the deer". What I am a "champion for" is logic and the decency it compels... but if you can't manage that, common retard sense should at least enable you to understand that--hunters have a direct incentive to perpetuate the problem.... it is as obvious as that big fat ass you have for brains. Regarding deer poison... I would have no objection if its relatively quick and painless... A practical problem would be that it would likely contaminate the carcass and I think some constituency is going to insist that the deer remain consumable. Maybe a gas like ether or chloroform or even carbon monoxide could be effectively used. |
By 06. 2....... on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 - 5:44 am: |
Probably a good time for a brief summary of the argument so far: I have argued that the state (Regional) deer population should be substantially reduced (even eradicated) to at least something approaching 1970's levels. ( a population low enough that it cannot substantially grow beyond yearly attrition. I've pointed out the fact that we are currently killing one third of the deer population per year.... which essentially makes us deer farmers, and imposes on us responsibility to ensure that these farmed animals are treated humanely. I have argued that a government agency devoted to "providing recreational hunting opportunities" should not be in charge of controlling menacing and expensive deer overpopulation. I have argued that we have an obligation to treat these "least" class creatures with humanitarian respect commensurate to our professed "civilization". I have argued that bowhunting is in practical fact no better than legalized cockfighting, dogfighting or bullfighting. It is a gratuitous cruelty that profoundly insults our intelligence. The counter argument provided: Deers suck, they are just big rats, we should publicly subsidize killing them for fun... but we shouldn't kill too many of them because that would reduce next year's fun opportunities. ___________________ This newspaper article has a morris twp perspective but it does corroborate the accusation that mayor Krappola is in fact fall of crap. Also verified, is my perception that police officers are generally psychotic sadistic fuckers just looking for an outlet for their arrogant, abusive, and violent tendencies. Deer hunt commences on Sept. 9 By JAMES LENT Editor 08/23/2006 Morris committee wants better advertising this year for program MORRIS TWP. - Having learned its lesson last year after residents complained they were not properly notified a deer hunt was taking place in the community, the Township Committee is getting word out in advance of this year's hunt. Township Committee members said last Wednesday, Aug. 16 hunters working through the police department will begin this year's hunt to cull the deer herd Saturday morning Sept. 9 around the township owned Butterworth and Woodland Avenue sewage treatment plants. Letters and emails have already been sent to residents, Township Committee man H. Scott Rosenbush said. Last September a total of 284 deer were killed in the hunt, 84 more than the township had anticipated. The township had planned the hunt after a 2005 aerial survey showed 1,256 deer in 25 square miles, including all 16.5 square miles of the township and parts of neighboring communities. The committee had also issued a survey to residents asking them if "reducing the deer population would benefit their neighbor hood." About 8,000 received the survey, which appeared in the township newsletter, but only about 2.8 percent responded with 216 saying they were in favor of reducing the deer herd, eight disapproving and two undecided. The only snag in last year's hunt was the lack of notification it was occurring. Several residents in support of the hunt said they were startled last year when the hunt began without warning. Rosenbush, who was mayor last year, had apologized to the residents, stating the program was brand new and was a learning experience for the township. He said this year's hunt would be better advertised. The hunt, which will use bows and arrows, will be run by Patrolman Steve Summerer, who will oversee the hunters, most of them police officers. According to Summerer, all the hunters are volunteers who will set up stands in secluded sections of the township on publicly owned land. Summerer explained the hunt poses no danger to residents. The hunters in the stands shoot arrows only, no guns, down toward the ground. There is virtually no chance a hunter could misfire and hurt someone, he added. Summerer, who has been involved in similar programs in Mendham and Harding town ships, said the chance of a stray arrow getting away is next to zero. He said hunters shoot from elevated tree stands within 20 yards or less from the deer, which have been baited to approach the deer stands. Summerer explained a single hunter is allowed on a particular piece of property at the times in which deer are most active: the first two hours of daylight in the morning and the last two hours of the day. He said the goal is to reduce the deer herd by about 200 over the course of the hunt, which will go on until at least the end of the year. He said the only time a shot deer might become visible to a neighborhood is if a wounded deer staggers off. He added the only time a resident would likely see a hunter would be if a deer does run onto a property. The hunters are legally obligated to remove the carcass. Deer cannot be hunted less than 450 feet from a residence, Summerer explained, adding that means 450 feet from a building only, not a property line. The hunters must disembowel the deer in the woods, remove the carcass but leave the innards, which will be quickly eaten by the wildlife in the woods, he added. Last year a total of 35 hunters were used. About $12,000 was spent in 2005, including the butchering, by using volunteer hunters screened by the police, according to Mayor Robert Nace. The deer meat was taken to a butcher Wayne Tinc in the Flanders section of Mount Olive Township. The butchered meat was then distributed, primarily to food programs for the needy, according to Nace. Nace said the township received one or two complaints about last year's hunt from "anti deer hunt people." Nace said the hunt would continue on a yearly basis for the next few years and in four or five years the township would again team with the Morris County Park Commission to authorize another infrared aerial survey to determine how much of the deer population remains. İRecorder Community Newspapers 2006 |
By 06. 2....... on Saturday, November 11, 2006 - 10:35 am: |
2006 Deer Management Harvest Numbers Sept-Qct. 47 Total Deer Harvested 35 Does & 12 Bucks Borough Harvest Locations Past Time Field 10 India Brook Park 8 Sisters of Christian Charily 8 Cosma Lake 5 Drake Rd. 6 Lowery Ln. 3 Bernardsville Rd. 2 Kerby Lane 3 Bliss Rd. 2 Note Feeders will not be filled for the month of November & December to limit expenditures and preserve the stock of corn. (Hunters will use corn as needed) |
By 06. 06. 126... on Friday, November 17, 2006 - 6:26 pm: |
By ItWasHereYesterday on Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 8:21 am: Wonder if that sack of shit from DPW is going to "acquire" anymore tree stands and ladders to haul out to Pa. Hunters be warned. Heard he liked fires too |
By 07. 2....... on Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 12:15 pm: |
"The Deer Problem" provides a pretty clear illustration of the "useless government problem" that seems just as out-of-control. By common sense understanding we know the vast majority of people want deer populations dramatically reduced. The vast majority of people have little concern for the humanity of the reduction method, and couldn't care less about any impact of reduction, on recreational opportunities for hunters. Yet, more than 10 years into an overpopulation crisis which has no doubt cost us hundreds of millions of dollars in environmental destruction, property damage, and injury (sometimes fatal) to human health, our "we the people" government hasn't provided any comprehensive, coordinated, or even rationally coherent policy. Compounding the problem we have a "popular media" that does little more then regurgitate whatever rhetoric it arbitrarily deems relevant. The public is provided no informed analysis, no logical testing, and no objective framing of the debate. Instead the public's just fed false partisan (vested-interest) choices, realistically incapable of helping to put us on the road to a real solution. Every newspaper article on the subject should explain that one-third of the deer population is relatively inhumanely "farmed" by sadistic recreational hunters every year. [this fact makes complaints about the cruelty of the bolt-gun referenced in one of the following articles pretty damn silly... I think "obviously" an intelligent deer would prefer the "relative" expedience of a bolt to the head over the arrow in the liver alternative.] It should also be pointed out that effective control (controll that will last more than a year or two) will require 90% of the female deer population to be rendered infertile... presumably through extermination as the most cost-effective method. Hunters, and advocates of piecemeal "culls", out of ignorance and vested interest, will never face up to this fact as they have no interest in controlling deer populations in anything but an out-of-control state which provides perpetually convenient recreational hunting opportunities. I have no doubt that honest deliberate scientifically-literate analysis of the problem can produce a solution that is cost-effective, and humanely decent-- In severity the problem is passed placating extremists (irrational tree huggers, and sadistic hillbilly hunters) and "we the people" really should start demanding, better media coverage, and better government policy.
quote: Backyard culling of N.J. deer proves controversial e-mail print The Record Friday, March 16, 2007 By RICHARD COWEN STAFF WRITER PETER MONSEES / THE RECORD arrowDeer feeding along the side of a road in Garret Mountain, Paterson. The deer-killing tactic is called "net and bolt" -- and it has proved to be efficient in reducing the hungry herd in one New Jersey town during the past three weeks. Since Feb. 23, a team of professional deer hunters from a company called White Buffalo Inc. has been laying bait and stringing nets in the back yards of Millburn, where some homeowners have been complaining about deer feeding on their plants and shrubs. Working mostly at night, White Buffalo hunters drop the nets when the deer arrive -- then shoot a metal rod into the netted deer's skull at point-blank range, killing the animal instantly. "Cruel and inhumane" is how animal lovers describe net and bolt, which as of Thursday, had killed 38 deer. "Quick and painless" is the way others see it, particularly homeowners who say too much wildlife is destroying their quality of life. One hundred years ago, there were no white-tailed deer in New Jersey, the population having been wiped out by rapid development and unregulated hunting. Now there are an estimated 150,000 stripping the forest, upsetting the ecological balance, nibbling on shrubbery and posing a danger to motorists. Just Thursday morning, a deer was struck on the Garden State Parkway in Paramus. But although the counties of Bergen, Passaic and Morris have their own deer problems, more bloodshed is something that most North Jersey officials say would not go over well with residents. "I don't think our residents would go for something like that," Charles Cuccia, Saddle River township administrator, said of the net-and-bolt program. "Living with wildlife is one of the reasons people like living in Bergen County. For every resident that thinks deer are a problem, there's someone else who likes seeing them in their back yard." But Millburn resident Arnold Selby says residents have become prisoners in their own homes, unable to enjoy their yards because the deer arrive at night to eat the plants, then leave a trail of droppings. "I can't play in my back yard with my grandson, and I'm afraid of Lyme disease," said Selby, a member of the township deer-management task force who operates his own Web site, soquol.org, that supports the culling effort. "It's a slaughterhouse in the back yard," counters Janet Pizar, a Millburn resident who runs a Web site opposed to the operation, netandboltcruelty.net. "And it's not so quick and painless. The deer are terrorized by the net. They kick and writhe and try to break free, and sometimes they suffer heart attacks. Sometimes the bolt doesn't go into the head cleanly. It's horrible." White Buffalo, which is under contract with Millburn through April 15, charges the township about $400 for each deer that it removes. A homeowner must first give the company permission to go on the property. Once a deer is slaughtered, White Buffalo pays to have it butchered and donates the meat to a food pantry. Millburn, in Essex County, is one of only two municipalities in New Jersey that have taken the drastic step of using net and bolt. The other is Princeton. A last-ditch effort to stop the culling failed Thursday when animal rights activists appeared in state Superior Court in Newark. The activists argued that the township should have notified all property owners who lived within 200 feet of a house where White Buffalo had set up its nets. But Judge Kenneth Levy rejected the argument, saying that the plan had been approved by the state Department of Environmental Protection, and he refused to grant an injunction. White Buffalo's president, Anthony J. DeNicola, did not return a phone call or respond to an e-mail seeking comment on Thursday. Millburn has budgeted about $31,000 for the project, Township Manager Tim Gordon said, adding that only time will tell whether deer complaints are reduced. The township is on the edge of the South Mountain Reservation, a huge nature preserve that is prime deer habitat. But that land is controlled by Essex County, which has no program to reduce the deer population. "Killing is not a nice process," Gordon said. "It will never be a nice process. But more and more people are calling each year about the deer problem. Is net and bolt cruel? Isn't letting an animal starve cruel as well?" E-mail: cowen@northjersey.com * * * Lethal and non-lethal methods # The white-tailed deer has no natural predator in New Jersey, and hunting remains the primary control mechanism. # Some 1,000 collisions between deer and vehicles are reported each week in New Jersey, said Rob Jennings, manager of natural resources for the Morris County Parks Department. # In its net-and-bolt program, White Buffalo Inc. kills trapped deer with a bolt gun also commonly used in slaughterhouses. The non-profit also helps towns manage deer through non-lethal methods, such as trap and release, and is experimenting with contraception in Morris County.
---------------------------
quote:Plants always greener on the other side of the (deer-proof) fence Sunday, March 18, 2007 BY LAWRENCE RAGONESE Star-Ledger Staff The plants are locked up. Literally. Like zoos for young trees, shrubs, yews and flowers. Owners of many formal gardens and arboretums in New Jersey have put their valuables behind gates and nets to protect them from the ravages of white-tailed deer. Now many are adding big time fencing. Thousands of feet of 8- to 12-foot-high fences costing hundreds of thousands of dollars are being installed to keep out deer that can turn valued gardens into wastelands overnight. In Morris County, the park commission may soon spend a quarter of a million dollars to encircle the 100-acre Frelinghuysen Arboretum in Morris Township. In Chester Township, it's the $2.5 million restoration of gardens of famed landscape architect Martha Brooks Hutcheson at Bamboo Brook that will likely get substantial fencing. Deer-proof fences also have been or will be added -- as unobtrusively as possible -- to the Reeves-Reed Arboretum in Summit, Deep Cut Gardens in Middletown, David C. Shaw Arboretum in Holmdel, Colonial Park rose garden in Franklin Township and a small natural area at the expansive Duke Farms in Hillsborough, among others. It's an alternative to hunting and culling deer or to using deer contraceptives and repellents, none of which have stopped white-tailed deer from munching their way through public gardens and arboretums. The result has been a loss of many native plants and severe damage to many that have survived. "The damage is constant and it's really disheartening," said Charles Zafonte, director of horticulture and natural resources for the Morris County Park Commission. "We know how good things could look here at Frelinghuysen, how beautiful this place could be. But the deer have done a job on what we have." The arboretum's hostas beds, for example, are decimated by deer every year, said Zafonte. Shortly after they bloom, deer turn the big leafy plants into something more resembling celery stalks. "They come, they taste, they like. It's a constant source of agony," said Zafonte. An arboretum is supposed to be a living museum of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants that are cultivated for educational and scientific purposes. It should include a wide range of offerings. The goal at the David C. Shaw Arboretum at Holmdel Park, for example, is to show all plants that might grow in the Monmouth County area. It should teach about the plants and encourage people to grow them, said Laura Kirkpatrick, public information officer for the Monmouth County Park Commission. But deer have voraciously attacked the collection, prompting the county to plan to fence in a portion of the very popular park. Monmouth County previously spent $110,000 for fencing at Deep Cut Gardens in Middletown. "We were protecting our incredible $2 million plant collection that was being destroyed there by deer," said Kirkpatrick. At Reeves-Reed Arboretum in Summit, an 8-foot fence was erected around the 13-acre property. It was a reluctant move that distressed some neighbors and changed the look and nature of the arboretum a bit, said Executive Director Gilles Misrobian. "We would not have roses and flowers here now without a fence," said Misrobian. The rose garden at Colonial Park Arboretum and Gardens in Franklin Township were under siege by deer several years ago, said Pierce Frauenheim, deputy director of the Somerset County Park Commission. Netting, held in place by bamboo sticks, covered many of the plants. Deer would try to jump over the nets, sometimes taking them down. In some cases, deer would get caught in the netting. "It was a bad situation, looked horrible," said Frauenheim, who said fences were erected at a cost of $27,000 to prevent destruction of the roses. Morris County this year expects to install 9,375 linear feet of fence at its Frelinghuysen Arboretum. It takes only a quick stroll of the grounds to see why. Outside the front door of the Frelinghuysen mansion a large group of yews are surrounded by plastic netting. Nearby, a long row of the hedges are wrapped in netting, too. A series of young trees have protective caging. The rhododendron trail has several dead plants. A walk down an azalea trail finds no azaleas -- all had been eaten by deer. There are costs to this damage, financial and aesthetic, said David Helmer, executive director of the Morris County Park Commission. Thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours of work are spent annually to keep deer from eating the plants, he said. Donors who gave substantial sums to create specific gardens have found their investments eaten. Work crews are diverted from garden-improvement tasks like pruning and weeding to spend time applying deer repellent and maintaining netting. Also, educational offerings are diminished and some arboretum visitors may be disappointed by a lack of plant varieties. "It's a sad commentary. But at some point, without taking action, people are going to tell us, 'We came here to see the plants,'" said Helmer. "And we're going to have to tell them, 'They're gone. The deer ate them.'" But deer fencing, if regularly inspected and well maintained, can make a big difference in the health of gardens. At Duke Farms, a square-mile parcel called "The Park at Duke Farms" was fenced in to keep deer out, and a second fence was erected to even better protect a 33-acre "research woods" used by researchers from Rutgers University. The result has been a resounding success. "Many native species have regrown. Butterflies and insects have returned," said Karen Kessler, a spokeswoman for Duke Farms. "We have restored some of the natural balance. It's back to the way it should look." Lawrence Ragonese may be reached at lragonese@starledger.com or (973) 539-7910. İ 2007 The Star Ledger
|
By 07. 07. 108... on Monday, March 19, 2007 - 3:13 pm: |
god bless these people in their endevior for they will pay my childrens way through college that someday they too would be able to aford such excentricities |
By 07. 213... on Sunday, November 04, 2007 - 1:07 am: |
sounds like deer have finally doubled the population of new jersey. Sounds like packs and herds are roaming all the boulevards with great alacrity. Sounds like you have a deer tribal fusion and a watering of thousands of hoofs every seasonal evening of the year with their bright eyes beaming back your duracell powered krypton bulbs as you trundle through your backyards at nights. Wait till the gopher tribes take hold and new potholes spring up in your perfectly manicured mcmansion lawns and make a marine corps boot camp obstacle course for your aching feet as you keep trundling over ever increasing deer. |
By 07. 175... on Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 1:33 pm: |
Mendham deer are delicious!!! I think they taste as good as Chester deer and Mt. Olive deer. Allowing local residents to take advantage of this resource does 2 good things. 1.) it reduces the Mendham deer population without incurring the rediculous costs found with "hired" management companies such as White Buffalo 2.) it feeds local families |
By 07. 07. 157... on Sunday, May 11, 2008 - 12:46 am: |
I just love the well worn tattered arguement that murdering deer with manly rifles, many with magnification scopes, is somehow a humanistic deer management issue. Rather than---interfering with other life forms living their lives in their environment, that we share with them, or they share with us. Who made us god? the rifle? They have families too, children, parents, mammalian emotions. You can always buy a cow burger or a lettuce salad or slice up some tomatoes with extra sharp shinto knives. You can crush parsley, dice walnuts, smash potatoes, boil carrots, tear up fruit into fine pulp and grind it further. Its not like we are stuck living hand to mouth in a Montana winter snowed in for dozens of miles all around. The mind that makes a thing like a high powered rifle I will never understand, nor have the need to. You choose to kill when its legal? What does that say about your soul. The act of pulling a trigger? The mind behind it. The heartlessness. You are doing them no favor. You are interfering with their time on earth. |
By 07. 178... on Monday, May 12, 2008 - 6:51 am: |
KILL KILL KILL...hahahahahaha...Kill em all!! Yummy deer!!!! |
By 07. 157... on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 6:37 pm: |
wouldn't it be better, even for you, to put a folding chair in your back yard at night and read to the raindeer with a helmet pocket light? you could start with Dickens and work down to contemporary books?? |
By 07. 27... on Monday, August 25, 2008 - 3:48 am: |
As there are no natural predators for the deer in the area, not culling only offers 2 other ends for the deer. Vehicle impact or starvation. Both take far longer to die from for a deer than a bow or gun. |
By 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 23... on Monday, August 25, 2008 - 7:35 am: |
KILLKILLKILLAAAAAAAAAHHHAAAAAAAHHHHHH.....All Deer must go!!!!....Seriously what are people all up in arms about? Its progress,right or wrong the area has been built out..... |
By 07. 14... on Saturday, October 04, 2008 - 5:20 pm: |
There are battalions of beady eyed deer watching from the hills with golden ember rays of piercing intelligence as you sleepily pour more water in your bird bath with your Green Garden Hose. |
By 07. 8... on Sunday, October 05, 2008 - 8:58 am: |
Gavone-boy, those deer are watching for you and your chocolate pump! |
By 07. 07. 48... on Monday, October 06, 2008 - 4:52 am: |
ALL DEER MUST GO!!ALL DEER MUST GO!!! |
By 07. 14... on Wednesday, October 08, 2008 - 8:49 am: |
the deer are marching on your car port as we speek!! |
By 07. 28... on Friday, October 02, 2009 - 1:07 pm: |
anybody see the lighted sign down by the county park? The secret is the hunters are chasing the deer out onto the road to save amunition. bad economy you know |
By 07. 1... on Thursday, December 31, 2009 - 5:10 pm: |
this is for the bow hunt in garrett mountain in west paterson/woodland park, they took there homes away from the deer. they put so many homes along the ridge of the mountain for the hovnanians condos and houses where else can they go but in our back yards, and to waive the 450 foot boundaries away from homes is dangerious to have it's like waiting for a serious thing to happen........leave them alone. |
By 07. 1... on Sunday, January 03, 2010 - 5:03 pm: |
After the deer are gone are you going to start complaining about the birds?!?! |
By 07. 07. 1... on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 - 12:18 pm: |
Bow season starts in 2 weeks, and everyone can start blogging again about the deer and hunters blah blah blah |
By 07. 07. 1... on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 - 3:11 pm: |
Kill Kill Kill ahahahahahahahahahahaha Kill kill Kill ahahahahahahahahahahahaa |
By 07. 1... on Saturday, October 11, 2014 - 9:50 am: |
sale information credit reports and scores accruing |
By 07. 1... on Monday, October 20, 2014 - 4:40 pm: |
economy months earning sale check credit score shopping recent specialize |
By 07. 1... on Monday, November 03, 2014 - 6:36 am: |
click here and get club penguin codes and membership generator. this is totally free of cost so visit here and get these codes. free codes for club penguin |
By 07. 1... on Thursday, March 05, 2015 - 6:38 am: |
They people are very worried about the progress of government Smallville leather jacket at getmyleather as he wants from them |
By 07. 1... on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - 11:06 am: |
I know your expertise on this. I must say we should have an online discussion on this. amazon gift card codes |
By 07. 1... on Monday, August 17, 2015 - 11:26 pm: |
What does a waist trainer do? Yet is the top quality any sort of various? But can you get premium quality at reasonable prices? |
By 07. 07. 1... on Monday, September 07, 2015 - 2:22 am: |
rayban, north face jackets, glasses online, adidas schuhe, coco chanel, lululemon, swarovski, oakley sunglasses, oakley, tory burch sandals, burberry outlet online, michael kors outlet online, retro jordans, chanel bags, michael kors, uggs outlet, reloj, michael kors outlet online, cheap jerseys, oakley sunglasses, christian louboutin outlet, michael kors outlet, ralph lauren, ferragamo, abercrombie fitch, toms shoes, toms shoes, roshe run, new balance outlet, ugg boots, north face, asics gel, nfl jerseys, rolex watches, nike outlet, thomas sabo uk, coach outlet, abercrombie, louis vuitton, <a |
By 07. 07. 1... on Friday, October 16, 2015 - 11:13 am: |
|